tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3951941131329967046.post5305588056308957193..comments2008-03-19T18:48:22.560-05:00Winkshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12441206903699707691noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3951941131329967046.post-53030733353410031022008-03-19T18:48:22.560-05:002008-03-19T18:48:22.560-05:00

Thanks Mr. Man, I agree, after looking at the pomeroy stats you are right on. Good point on TO per possession, I should of looked at that. As for some of my "wacky" statements, I meant it to say Krabbenhoft and Landry would probably loosly double him possibly with a front back double, especially when Beasley is in the paint. Stiesma I think would be too slow to guard him alone and Butch is

Bearnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3951941131329967046.post-20768658432880819062008-03-19T12:20:50.979-05:002008-03-19T12:20:50.979-05:00

Good effort. I recommend that you use Ken Pomeroy's stats when you're doing your discussions. They're far more accurate. For example, the raw number of turnovers per game doesn't matter as much as the percentage of possessions that a team turns the ball over. (Pomeroy provides those stats for free.) On that scale, UW is quite good, but not great. They have been doing quite well of late though (1

Mr.Manhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09640299265197754525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3951941131329967046.post-81265444444354105522008-03-18T13:39:10.974-05:002008-03-18T13:39:10.974-05:00

Congrats Bear on the first Bucky Channel article I've printed off for the bathroom! (By the way, I took off the labels on the page if anyone else was looking to do some bathroom reading as well. I'm looking into one of those TagCrowd things, but for now, enjoy the article).

Winkshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12441206903699707691noreply@blogger.com